The achievement gap between whites
and blacks in the 1960s was a major problem, but since we started integrating
schools that problem has decreased. Now the major achievement gap isn’t between
whites and blacks, but it is between the rich and poor. An article by Sabrina
Tavernise, “Education Gap Grows Between Rich and Poor, Studies say” states that
Professor Reardon made a study and found that “the gap between affluent and
low-income students has grown by forty percent since the 1960s and is now
double the testing gap between black and whites” (tavernise 1). These studies
where taken in 2008 and 2009 before the recession really hit and affected the
people. The effects of the recession would only show these results in a larger
scale.
Until recently families have been
able to select their children’s schools. Now school choices are driven by
wealth. Many people who are able to afford residence in middle class suburban
areas have the opportunity to send their children to successful high school,
where as people who can only afford residing in urban or rural areas are forced
to put their kids in failing high schools. The lack of school choice is
increasing this achievement gap between the low-income students and the
high-income students. Theresa Harrington’s article “Many Bay Area districts
fail to adequately educate low-income and minority students, reports find”
states, “In the graduation rates category, San Ramon Valley, Castro Valley and
Pleasanton all earned A's, while Oakland got an F”. These students living in
urban areas are victims of a system that is telling them that they are failures
who can only achieve low-income jobs. This system of school choice is creating
a never-ending cycle for families who live in poverty.
The environment in which low-income
students attend school also gives them less hope that they will succeed. Almost
every classroom (k-12) in suburban areas is decorated with work that the
students have done and inspirational and hopeful quotes. When entering a school
in an urban or rural area it is apparent that no one has faith in the
children’s success because there are only a couple of teachers willing to
provide that hopeful environment for their student. If this molecular example
isn’t enough the faith the district has for the schools is another problem In
the book Savage Inequalities Kozol states, “Morris High could be a wonderful
place, a centerpiece of education, theater, music every kind of richness for
poor children. The teachers I've met are good and energized. They seem to love the children, and the
kids deserve it. The building mocks their
goodness” (130). The appearance of the exterior building is provided by the
lack of funding for the school. In order to achieve a classroom full of hopeful
students you need the teachers and the district need to provide a hopeful
environment for them. They should not be reminded of their current economic
status but encouraged to obtain a better future for themselves.